Communist Party of China Delegate Election Shows Improved Intra-Party Democracy

Xinhua/People’s Daily Online

BEIJING, Aug. 16 (Xinhua) — After almost one year of campaigning, the Communist Party of China (CPC) has elected its delegates to the 18th National Congress, demonstrating both its understanding of democratic procedure and an optimized lineup with more younger, grassroots-level Party members.

Image from the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China

Earlier this week, the CPC published a list of names for the 2,270 delegates for its 18th National Congress, which will be held in the second half of this year.

Improved election measures have shown that the Party does not regard the election as mere routine, but as an important demonstration of intra-Party democracy that will serve as a critical factor in establishing a substantial democracy in a socialist country.

At a press conference on the delegate election, the first of its kind in the Party’s history, the Party’s organization department said earlier this week the measures include a multi-candidate survey on preliminary candidates, expanded loss margins for candidates and the publication of the list of delegates.

Democracy is an indispensable goal for developing political civilization, as there can be no substantial democracy if there is no procedural democracy. Improved intra-Party democracy will help Party members exercise their rights and ensure that they can express their true opinions with their votes.

The Party has devoted itself to institutional innovation so as to adapt to ever-developing situations in and outside the Party. In the past decade, its intra-Party election system has evolved, with top decision-makers creating policies for more democratic elections. The Party’s grassroots units have also implemented new election practices.

“The election of delegates to the Party’s 18th National Congress is a mirror that reflects the degree of democracy in the Party,” said Ye Zhuchu, a professor from the Party school of the CPC Central Committee.

The lineup of delegates has also been optimized through expanded representation.Leaders of rural cooperatives, rural teachers and doctors, ordinary farmers and other delegates from all walks of society can express their opinions through the congress.

About 30.5 percent of the delegates are from the grassroots level, up 2.1 percentagepoints from the previous congress in 2007. The average age of the delegates is 52,while 64.8 percent of the delegates are under 55. More than 93 percent of thedelegates have college degrees.

The change came after the CPC Central Committee asked for more delegates from grassroots units, especially industrial workers, farmers and professionals.

Thanks to rapid social and economic development, the social strata of China’s population has witnessed great changes. Professionals have become one of the major contributors to the market economy. Urbanization has encouraged hundreds of millions farmers to enter cities and become migrant workers, while urban residents outnumber the rural population for the first time in China’s history.

The diversification of the delegates is the CPC’s response to societal changes andrepresents its commitment to representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people.

It also shows that the Party always advances with the times.

*note: Originally found on People’s Daily Online.

2 responses to “Communist Party of China Delegate Election Shows Improved Intra-Party Democracy

  1. Not that I’m insinuating anything, but is Xinhua really the best and most unbiased source for things like this?

    Of course, there is evidence from independent sources that can collaborate with the information here, but I have a hard time taking at face value anything that media controlled by one source is saying about that same source.

    But I suppose that the same applies to the media controlled by business and industry interests.

    • “But I suppose that the same applies to the media controlled by business and industry interests.”

      Spot on with that one, comrade! As someone who studied and worked in journalism for quite some time, I can say with some certainty that there is no such thing as lack of bias in media – there’s only information that serves one purpose or another.

      In our society, journalists at even supposedly “independent” outlets are subject to a range of filters restricting what they can report – advertising dollars are huge (don’t want to offend someone who’s paying you), as is the possibility of public (mostly right-wing) backlash, the possibility of crossing one source by using another (e.g. a businessman walks because you interviewed his union adversary), etc.

      Every society in history testifies to this phenomenon – the spread of mass information is restricted by the interests of the ruling class. In our present era in our society, that’s the ruling imperialist capitalist class.

      China is no exception, nor is any other socialist country. Cuba, Vietnam, Korea, Laos, and in the past the Soviet Union, East Germany, Yugoslavia, Albania, etc. all have restrictions on their media, the same as any other country. The difference is whose interests those restrictions serve.

      Of course, the individual reader has to formulate their own opinion, and some readers may be more skeptical of Xinhua than they are of Granma or Nhan Dan, the same as readers of liberal capitalist papers may find the Toronto Star or the UK Independent more trustworthy than the New York Times or the UK Guardian. But that’s why I never shy from acknowledging the exact source of the material – communists must always read critically, and it’s our editorial policy to do everything in our power to allow us to do so 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s